A writ of Habeas
Corpus calls upon the person who has detained another to produce the latter
before the court, in order to let the court know on what ground he has been
confined and to set him free if there is no legal justification for the
imprisonment. The words ‘habeas corpus’ literally mean ‘to have a body’. This
writ may be addressed to an official or a private person, who has another
person in his custody.
Mandamus literally means a command. It commands the person
to whom it is addressed to perform some public or quasi- public legal duty
which he has refused to perform and the performance of which cannot be enforced
by any other adequate legal remedy. Mandamus cannot be enforced by any other
adequate legal remedy. Mandamus cannot be granted against the President, or the
Governor of a state, for the exercise and performance of the powers and duties
of his office.
The writ of Prohibition is a writ issued by the Supreme
Court or a High Court to an inferior court forbidding the latter to continue
proceeding therein in excess if its jurisdiction or to usurp a jurisdiction
with which it is not legally vested.
While mandamus is available not only against judicial
authorities but also against administrative authorities, prohibition and
certiorari are issued only against judicial or quasi-judicial authorities.
Though prohibition and certiorari are both issued against
Court or Tribunals exercising judicial or quasi-judicial powers, certiorari is
issued to quash order or decision of the Court or Tribunal while prohibition is
issued to prohibit though Court or Tribunal from making the ultra vires order
or decision. Prohibition is available during the pendency of the proceeding and
before the order is made, certiorari can be issued only after the order has
been made.
Quo warranto is a
proceeding whereby the court enquires into-the legality of the claim which a
party asserts to a public office, and to oust him from its enjoyment if the
claim is not well founded.
The conditions necessary for the issue of a writ of quo
warranto are as follows:
The office must be public and it must be created by a
statute or by the constitution itself. The office must be a substantive one and
not merely the function or employment of a servant at the will and during the
pleasure of another. There has been a contravention of the Constitution or a
status or statutory instrument, in appointing such person to that office.
The limitations on
the enforcement of the fundamental rights are as follows:
Parliament has the power to modify the application of the
Fundamental Rights to the members of the Armed Forces, Police Forces or
intelligence organizations so as to ensure proper discharge of their duties and
maintenance of discipline amongst them {Ref: Art 33}.
When martial law is in force, Parliament may indemnity any
person in the service of the union or a State for any act done by him {Ref:
Art. 34}.
Certain fundamental rights guaranteed by the Constitution
may remain suspended, while a Proclamation of /emergency is made by the
President under Art. 352.
Right to Information
Right to information has been granted to every citizen of
India under Right to information Act, 2005 which came into force on 12th
October, 2005
It is not a Fundamental right but it entails a clause for
penalty in case of delay in giving information to the applicant.
Information Commission has been set-up at central and state
levels to oversee implementation of the Act.
No comments:
Post a Comment